- The second half of 2013 witnessed some major changes in the areas of banking, property and taxation. Loan approval was based on net income after all deductions. In the past, it was based on gross income.
- This move alone handicapped a significant number of applicants and many had their loans rejected or approved for lower amounts instead. The buyer thus had to forego the purchase or had to come out with higher down payments.
- For those who poured out high down payments, the reduced disposable cash served its intended goal, which is to stifle speculation activity for those who aimed to flip it as soon as practicably possible.
- However, this measure did not stop foreigners who had the benefit of higher exchange rates from making continued and sustained purchases. Very often, these foreigners made cash purchases and the tweaking of loan requirements were of no consequence to them.
- Then came the next salvo. Minimum price for property purchase by foreigners was raised to RM1m and this was coupled with an upward revision of the Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT).
- By referencing against the Singapore Dollar (SGD) at an exchange rate of RM2.50, the entry price thus became SGD400k. Not exactly a deterrent since HDB flats in Singapore cost way more than that.
- As such, genuine foreign buyers still made a bee-line to developers doors albeit the need to fork out more in terms of entry price. This thus made the foreign quota allocated by developers, a sure sale.
- The RPGT put a major halt to speculators who bought just to trade it away as a commodity. Coupled with restrictive lending, a dampener has been put in place to restrict runaway prices.
- The effectiveness in the interim at least, looks promising. Only time will tell whether these cooling measures have achieved its intended outcome.
- While foreigners seem to be unscathed by these revisions, the general pulse among local purchasers look a little withered these days. Those who jumped into the property bandwagon at elevated prices seem to have no spare cash to purchase another unit.
- This is evident by the new banners put up by some developers. The artwork may have changed but the model is still the same. It simply indicates that these houses remain unsold even though the banner and buntings have faded due to rain and sunlight.
- Usually, these are luxury units such as bungalows and semi-detached houses. Locals simply do not earn high enough to afford while foreigners who have no problem with the price, have used up their quota. The developer thus, is left with unsold units.
- Locals who bought at steep prices in the past mainly did so out of fear rather than need. Many, whom we have spoken to, were willing to part with their entire savings due to the fear of not being able to afford a house in future.
- Another segment bought extra units either as investments for their children or simply out of greed to capitalise on the frenzy of fear by selling it to those who missed purchasing it in the past.
- Back to the unsold units. we anticipate the usage of very creative financing options by developers to get these units sold. Among the popular methods known is the rebate approach to reduce initial down payment to the popular guaranteed rental scheme.
- Our thoughts are that this will continue for a while and if the “discounts” are enticing enough, there will be takers. For now, prices still seem to be at lofty heights and we don’t see them crashing down.
- Otherwise, there will be pandemonium in the financial markets with banks, developers, loan borrowers and even the stock market experiencing major turbulence which can bring back memories of the 1997 financial crisis.
- As we see it, either one has to increase income to stay where one wants to live, or consider moving to areas beyond city limits where it’s more affordable. Such is the price of development.
- Otherwise, the government has to come out with significant number of units of affordable housing within city limits or drastically improve our badly needed public transport system to encourage migration to suburban areas. Only time will tell how this pans out.
- In the meantime, here’s wishing everyone all the best in finding your property of choice. May you find it sooner rather than later.
- Merry Christmas and Happy 2014!
At DASON & DASON, we specialise in 3 core areas as follows: (i) Taxation, (ii) Risk & Wealth Management and (iii) Business Administration & Compliance. The articles which we post here are meant to educate the general public in our field of work and core competencies. Should you have any queries pertaining to the articles or our field of work, kindly feel free to post them in the comments section or email us at dason@dason.com.my. Thank you.
Monday, 23 December 2013
Property Investment Musings
Tuesday, 19 November 2013
Money Matters
- A call came from a client who recently acquired a house in Serene Park and was re-looking at his MRTA (Mortgage Reducing Term Assurance) options.
- From our previous dealings, we have suggested to take MLTA (Mortgage Level Term Assurance) instead, to which he is agreeable after balancing the pro’s and cons of the plan. He was also looking at a plan that covers Critical Illnesses (CI) rather than the basic coverage of Death & Disability.
- The new loan was at RM265k. Around a year ago, he acquired an apartment which carried a RM200k loan and he took up an MLTA plan to mitigate the risk.
- As our meeting went on, he informed us that the apartment has been since been sold off and was in the process of changing hands. This transaction was expected to be completed in about 3 month’s time.
- The question thus is, how much should he take for the new loan in view of the soon to be completed disposal? Should he re-cycle the previous MLTA and just top up the difference of RM65k or take a plan for the full RM265k since the previous unit has yet to be disposed in its entirety?
- If one is paranoid, then, the new MLTA should be at RM265k. However, this may be an overkill since the apartment is already on its way out. There is such thing as risk and then there is calculated risk.
- We explained to him that, when it comes to property investment, it may not be practical to insure the entire amount of loan for all properties. In practice, one should categorise properties as core holdings and trade commodities.
- The core units should be protected in full as the primary intention is for long term retention (for self use or rent collection) while the other group is held with the aim of disposal should the right situation arise.
- Examples of core units are the house one resides in, the office one operates from as well as other units that are meant for portfolio building.
- He thus concluded that the house is a core unit that must be protected from risk and the apartment as a trade item. We suggested that he performs this core/non-core asset exercise periodically to gauge his risk exposure and the mitigating action needed.
- In the end, he decided to take an additional coverage of RM100k instead. The rationale was to have an additional RM35k for the family even after the house loan has been settled in full.
- We suppose, when one is a husband/father, leaving something extra behind as a parting gift is the least one can do.
- Loans are a good financial tool but just like fire, if precautions are not there, it can burn the house down. Happy investing!
Sunday, 6 October 2013
Property Investment Musings
- Property investment can be a high stakes game and sometimes when the opportunity presents itself, a fast decision, albeit with risk attached, can be very rewarding.
- A case in hand relates to our client who had to make a snap decision when the situation arose. Many would have gone home to think or even sleep over it when big ticket items come by. We are of the opinion that to be extraordinary, one needs to act and live extraordinarily.
- It was a Sunday afternoon in August 2010 and everyone at home was in deep slumber. Unable to join in the siesta, he dropped by SP Setia’s sales office in Bukit Indah to kill time. On display was the mock-up of the then latest offering known as Indah Walk 3 Lifestyle Offices. It was a 5-storey retail and office block with around 140 units in various sizes.
- On enquiry, some units were still available especially inner ones that were not facing the main road. Since this was an office block with lifts, the general rule of getting ground/lower units may not apply. Higher may actually be better.
- However, being a commercial entity, ground floor units are the most valuable due to ease of access, but the developer was only renting them out. This automatically made the highest floor, especially the main road facing corner unit as the most valuable.
- On display was a building plan of all the units available with coloured stickers on them indicating those that have been sold and those that are still available. Naturally, he eyed the blank units and spoke to the sales staff with regards to pricing and financing matters.
- This went on for a good one hour and what was supposed to be a casual visit to the developer’s office is slowly morphing into a potential unplanned purchase. With his interest piqued, he needed a second opinion from a trustworthy party.
- He then phoned his business partner to drop by and join-in the enquiry. Upon arriving, the partner re-visited the display sheet and noticed that the top floor corner unit facing main road had a different coloured sticker from all other units that were already sold.
- When asked, it turned out to be a previously booked unit where the purchaser failed to secure a loan. The best saleable unit was now available for the picking! However, for a 2,000 sq ft office, it was priced at a steep RM426k.
- Back then, this was a relatively high number even for a commercial unit. Today, at RM213/sq ft, it’s practically a steal. Many residential condominiums are priced between RM500 – RM1,000/sqft, what more commercial lots.
- Back to our case. A decision would have to be made and it has to be made fast. Just about anyone can place a booking fee as the thinking and talking process is going on.
- Since it was just a casual visit, no money was brought for the RM3k booking fee. Going to the ATM machine risked the unit being intercepted by another lucky buyer.
- To his surprise, the partner had the exact RM3k in his pocket. It was the prior day’s takings from their mini market that has yet to be banked in. Talk about luck. Getting a cool unit and having the exact amount of booking fee!
- The transaction was done and with the loan kicking in around 3 weeks later, he was the proud owner of a nice office unit. Today, that unit is leased out to Dason & Dason and we have prominently displayed our signboards in the most elevated and advantageous position as seen from our profile picture above.
- Despite our persuasion, he is unwilling to part with the unit, citing that he was destined to be its owner with such series of occurrences. We suppose so too.
- When presented with an opportunity, a quick decision may sometimes be needed. We reckon, the Greek poet Homer was right when he wrote, “Fortune favours the Brave”. In this case, we suppose luck played a big part in being brave.
- Always be on the lookout for such deals. Opportunity knocks on everyone’s door. The question is, are we ready to welcome it in?
- Happy investing!
Monday, 16 September 2013
Money Matters
- Every now and then, our clients and friends will enquire about savings programmes that assist in reducing taxes and building a retirement nest egg.
- We dutifully show them the various options available and give them a projected value on maturity.
- Most plans tend show 2 sets of Illustration, one being the most favourable and the other, the most conservative. In all reality, both will not occur as it is improbable to have a consistent set of returns every year. There will be up’s and equally, downs.
- A mid-point would thus be the most practical value to gauge expectations. Although simplistic in approach, it is still better than relying on either extreme.
- At this point, one in two times, we get remarks like “The plan gives back RM100k in 20 years time? What is the value of RM100k then? What can it do with inflation being so high?”
- Usually, this remark comes from those who are highly educated and holding decent paying jobs. The "normal" ones usually just get things started and move on to other matters.
- In our years of practice, the ones who got things done are living reasonably comfortable lives and are midway through their retirement plans. When they retire, they will cash out their EPF/CPF as well as live off the Private Pension Plans that we have helped structure.
- They may not be wealthy, but they will have money to live, eat, go for vacation and enjoy the simpler things in life with dignity. They will not have to beg and depend on anyone else but themselves.
- The intelligent ones however, keep talking about how inflation eats away values and are constantly seeking for plans that will beat inflation. Even after 10 years, they are still talking and talking but just never getting down to doing.
- They are just too smart for their own good. They are procrastinators who just keep delaying and delaying. When they do get down to doing it, they will analyse it so much that in the end, they are back to square one.
- Back to Point 5 above. we agree that RM100k can get a bungalow 20 years ago but can only be the down payment for a cluster house today. Purchasing power has deteriorated over the years due to inflation.
- But the fact remains, RM100k is still a big sum of money back then and still is now. Just how many ordinary people can casually raise RM100k as and when needed? The sooner we take the first step towards implementing a savings plan that disciplines us, the safer we are in our greying years to come.
- The decision made by the Young You today determines’ how the Old You will be in years to come. If you have yet to start any, get it done. If you have done one, get a second one started. If you have done an Endowment, get an Annuity started. There must be progress.
- Here’s wishing you all the best in getting things moving. Just don’t let too much analysis lead to paralysis.
- To quote the immortalised slogan from Nike, “Just Do It!”.
Saturday, 7 September 2013
Money Matters
- Some say debt is good. Others swear that borrowed money causes misery.
- Debts, when used wisely and free from emotion, can yield good financial harvests. The implementation however, is not as easy as it sounds.
- Investing is not for everyone. Many end up losing money due to greed (not cashing out when due) and fear (cashing out too early). If these twin emotions are not manageable, stay away from investments, especially, borrowed investments.
- So back to debts. Is it good to borrow or should investments be funded with savings only?
- Let’s analyse the case of two Accountants who are in similar earning capacity and age group but with differing opinion when it comes to creating an investment portfolio.
- Accountant G is in his mid-30’s and has fully settled his housing loan within 5 years and his car in 2 years. He opines that settling loans as fast possible and saving on the interest via high down payment and lump sum periodical deposits are in itself good returns on investment.
- Today, he has no loans and truly living a debt-free life. His cash savings are at a decent level equivalent to 9 months living expenses and he fully owns the house he lives in with his young family.
- The other, Accountant A is highly geared with loans exceeding RM3m and is the owner of 10 properties. All the properties were acquired over a period of 7 years and are generating rental income over and above the respective monthly instalments.
- When asked, Accountant G says that he is unable to purchase any new properties as prices have moved too fast and even if he could do so, his nature of borrowing as little and short as possible makes it financially untenable.
- Accountant A has emergency funds amounting to 3 months expenses and wishes he has more liquidity. He however, has no regrets stretching his loans and cash to capture properties just before the wave came.
- Looking at these two cases, who is better off financially?
- From a liquidity sense, Accountant G wins hands down. There is no debts, no instalments, hence no worries. He however, is regretful for not being alert to ride on the property wave despite Accountant A’s advice years ago.
- Accountant A has amassed great wealth via property appreciation and has made paper-profits exceeding 100% on almost all his properties. He is cock-sure that his units will continue to generate rental as they are of prime location. He does confide however, on the worry of servicing the loans should a financial crisis occur.
- Hence the trade-off between returns and liquidity. Liquid assets generate lousy returns and vice versa. The key is striking a balance.
- Before venturing into hard assets, ensure that there is sufficient liquidity to withstand financial shocks. Funds should be split into separate accounts, one for unforeseen circumstances and the other as seed capital to acquire assets.
- This way, the usage of funds from one account will not affect the ability of the other. One is able to grow the Balance Sheet and still have funds for emergencies.
- Back to our Accountants. In a rising market, the one who bought with very little debt loses out. In this case, his unwillingness to borrow. The available fund was used to finance only a single property.
- By the time the first asset was settled, prices moved up by leaps and bounds. He could only be a mere spectator as his time has passed. The only thing is to look out for rare unappreciated gems that may or may not come. The consolation is that he is cash rich in an inflation fuelled economy.
- The obvious winner is the one who capitalised on cheap finance and borrowed just as the market was rising. It was a gamble but as long as the asset generated returns and his income allowed such a loan, then it is a worthwhile risk.
- In conclusion, when investing or wanting to invest, one needs to keep abreast with the pulse of the economy. Know when to leverage on loans and when not to. Experience is a good teacher but other people’s experience is a better teacher.
Sunday, 1 September 2013
Money Matters
- Not everyone saves for a rainy day. For those who do, we can distinguish them into two broad categories.
- The first are those who save after they have allocated expenses away and only then try to set aside for a rainy day on whatever little that remains. That will be akin to the equation of Savings = Income – Expenses.
- Unfortunately, this type of saving is flawed and sadly, most people fall into this category. Worse still are those with inconsistent income who can never save systematically.
- The other kind employ the concept of Income – Savings = Expenses. This group live within their means. Frugality is practiced to keep within the planned expense. They save first and then decide what commitments to enter into later.
- When people practice financial discipline, money is never a problem. However, many spend first and depending on how high that commitment is, only then decide whether they can save any money at all.
- Back to savings. Just how much should one set aside?
- Well, the amount depends on the following 3 accounts being Emergency Fund, Consumptive Fund and Retirement Fund.
- Set aside between 3 – 6 months of expenses as Emergency Fund. This acts as a form of retrenchment back-up so as not be pressurised to take the first opening that comes when in-between jobs.
- Another approach is to save enough to feel confident. If that amount is Rm10k, then that is the amount one should strive for. If RM15k makes you feel secure, then that should be the goal. Although the approach is not mathematical as Point 8 above, it still does the job.
- Ideally, this amount should be kept separate from the regular salary/income account so as to ensure clear demarcation of funds. The Emergency Fund should be left liquid either as a Regular Savings Account or at most, a Fixed Deposit Account for tenure of no more than 12 months.
- Next is to create the Consumptive Fund account. As the name suggests, this amount is set aside to be spent once the desired amount is achieved. Big ticket items such as a new car, house, exotic vacation, etc are just some of the things that many of us desire.
- However, most do not set aside funds in a systematic manner and end up taking out whatever savings they have to finance these purchases. As a result, should an emergency occur, things become very sticky.
- The savings timeline in this account can be spread between 12-36 months, depending on the quantum. Once the targeted amount is achieved, withdraw the funds and spend it on the item.
- Due to the longer savings timeline, it is encouraged to place these funds in semi-liquid form such as Fixed Deposit or in low risk Unit Trusts such as Money Market or Bond Fund.
- Retirement Funds should be placed in illiquid instruments that pay out better returns due to the longer savings timeline. For the majority who are employed, one such option is the EPF.
- However, due to relatively low contribution rates, the final amount might not be sufficient for a retiree to live on comfortably. Hence why voluntary savings schemes such as Private Retirement and Annuities are additional tools towards a decent Retirement Fund.
- In a nutshell, the 3 separate funds play different savings objectives. While an Emergency Fund focussed on liquidity, the Retirement Fund concentrated on generating returns. A compromise in the form of timeline trade-off is needed to achieve these objectives.
- The Consumptive Fund however, is a mid-point since it focuses on various items with differing timelines. It balances returns with matching tenures.
- In conclusion, make a decision to save an amount on a consistent basis. A starting point between 5%-10% of gross income can be the first step towards gradually setting aside a very significant 25%. It is said that practice makes perfect. That saying applies here too.
- While it is easy to say, the same cannot be repeated when it comes to execution of a plan. This requires determination and discipline. Only when there’s extra revenue, is there room to manoeuvre for Investments.
Tuesday, 27 August 2013
Money Matters
- We all want financial freedom. The question is, just what is Financial Freedom?
- It varies from person to person. Some say it’s when passive incomes surpass living expenses. Some say, it’s when there’s no debts to pay. Others define it as when one does not have to work for a living.
- All are correct from their perspective. To each, their own.
- The journey to financial freedom has many routes. Just like climbing a mountain, we always start from the bottom.
- Fundamental to a proper financial plan, is having proper protection via a suitable insurance policy. As a bare minimum, Medical and Debt Cancellation Plans are of utmost importance.
- With so many Medical plans in the market, just how does one choose a suitable plan?
- Well, as a general guide, these matters should be considered before a decision is firmed up :-
- - Choose a plan that is renewable at your option. Imagine the nasty surprise where an insurer kicks you out just when you need it the most.
- - Study the amount for Internal Limits, if any. These are restriction in usage for specified illnesses such as Outpatient Cancer and Kidney Dialysis, which could be much lower than limits for all other illnesses. Avoid policies that discriminate. If unable to, then ensure that limits are as uniform as possible.
- - Evaluate whether a policy has any Deductible or Co-Insurance elements. In the case of the former, the insured’s liability is fixed while most Co-Insurance plans go along shared percentage on the total bill.
- - Do you want a policy that grows to keep up with inflation or one that remains stagnant? What RM100k can do today is superior to RM100k a decade into the future.
- The next important policy is a Debt Cancellation plan. As the name suggests, the objective of this plan is to ensure debts taken by the insurer is settled in the event of a triggering event and the family are in not burdened by the outstanding loan.
- Most banks offer this type of protection in the form of Mortgage Reducing Term Assurance (MRTA) when borrowers take on housing loans. However, most borrowers are not aware of what is known as Mortgage Level Term Assurance (MLTA).
- The MRTA shadows the loan value while a MLTA remains constant despite the reduction in loan with each instalment paid. For those who wish to purchase more than one property, MLTA is a better option where one policy can be tailored to cover a few loans. MRTA on the other hand, varies according to number of loans and can prove to be confusing at times.
- A very important element when taking MRTA/MLTA is the inclusion of Critical Illness (CI) coverage. Most standard policies cover only Death and Disability as triggering events. The statistics of falling into serious illness far outweighs the odds of meeting an untimely Death.
- With insurance policies put into place to secure the income source, the next step of Savings and Accumulation can be put into motion. We will explore that topic in the next article.
Sunday, 25 August 2013
Property Investment Musings
- An interesting situation happened some time ago to a friend whom I know very well. He had the pleasure of purchasing a semi-detached house located at Horizon Hills in late 2011 for a then princely sum of RM900k.
- Construction was in an advanced stage when he purchased and the house was promptly delivered by the developer around mid 2012. Armed with the keys to the property, he had a change of heart and decided to sell the unit although the original intention was for own occupation.
- The main incentive for the change of plans was the rapid rise in prices for new launches, which was only due for completion some 2 years in future. He now had a property that was ready for occupation and was in high demand.
- By October, a buyer was found for Rm1.35m and it so happened to be a foreigner who incidentally was a Privilege Banking customer of a UK based bank. In a matter of days, a loan amounting to 60% of purchase price was secured, with the bank accepting full valuation.
- A Conditional Sales and Purchase Agreement (SPA) was signed because State consent was needed for transactions involving foreigners.
- The buyer placed a deposit amounting to 10% of the purchase price and the SPA was drafted such that in the event State consent was not obtained, then the SPA will be terminated with full refund of any monies exchanged between both parties.
- However, once consent was obtained, the SPA will thus become unconditional and all parties are bound by the contract entered into. Any termination by either party at this stage will incur damages that must be compensated to the aggrieved party.
- Due to year end and the uncertainty of the impending General Elections, State approval got delayed longer than expected and was only obtained in early March 2013. By then, 5 months has gone by since the SPA was entered into.
- In this short time, the purchaser’s financial situation has deteriorated due to unforeseen medical expenditure incurred by a family member. He was unable to raise the remaining 30% of the purchase price amounting to RM405k.
- Since State consent was obtained, the buyer is now caught between forfeiting the initial 10% amounting to RM135k or come out with a further 30% to complete the purchase.
- Sadly, he had to forfeit. The SPA was aborted and in the end, everyone involved in the process got paid except the buyer and the loan officer who processed the loan.
- The lesson learned from this misadventure for the buyer can be summarised as follows :
- -When big ticket items are involved, conclude it as fast as possible as a change in circumstance may lead to severe losses.
- -Segregate funds carefully so as not to mix them up when entering into legally enforceable obligations.
- -Always keep an extra amount of funds just in case unexpected costs come up. One can never be too prudent when anticipating expenditure.
- -Always be careful of local laws when dealing with overseas ventures.
- -On top of the loss of deposit, there were abortive legal costs. The final loss might be financially crippling.
- Back to the friend. He was now RM135k richer, less legal costs incurred, which incidentally was very insignificant as the bulk of charges was incurred on the purchasers side.
- By then, property prices have raced even higher and he now decided to stay in it as per original intention. The only difference is, he now has an extra RM135k for the renovation budget.
- Hence concludes the tale of the boomerang property.
- Happy reading.
Saturday, 17 August 2013
Property Investment Musings
- Is it the right time to purchase a property now? Should I delay until the price falls? Should I buy now before prices go up?
- These are the common questions that we hear on and off. Sadly, for both the person asking and us listening, we simply just can’t see the future. If we could, well, the firm will be a very wealthy for we will be able to foresee the next 4D draw and place all funds on the winning number.
- The questions, however, are not without answers. Let’s assume the property is for own accommodation. Then, the answer is simple. It just simply doesn’t matter when one buys.
- Allow us to illustrate our reasoning. Let’s say a double storey house in Nusa Idaman is purchased at Rm800k for own stay. Due to persistent demand, in one year’s time, similar units are now being sold in both in the primary and secondary market at amounts in excess of Rm1m. How does this augur for the purchaser?
- Well, for starters, there is a gain of Rm200k due to capital appreciation. The purchaser will be patting him/herself on the back for such a fantastic investment decision. Heck, he/she might even be claiming bragging rights on such foresight!
- The glaring thing however, is that the gain is merely a paper profit where it’s only academic unless it is disposed and the value is monetised. Secretly, the purchaser may be cursing for not getting 2 units in the first place, one for dwelling and the other to flip.
- What if the situation is reversed instead? Prices take a dive for whatever reason and the market value is now hovering at Rm700k range. What now? Did the purchaser lose RM100k?
- Again, it’s just a paper loss. Maybe a bruised ego to boot but that’s about the damage that the buyer is going to sustain. Since he/she is occupying the house, a sale is unlikely and thus no loss will be recorded.
- So, in the end, it really does not make sense to time the market when there is a genuine need. The only thing is the natural human behaviour of wanting a bargain where an item is procured on the lowest possible price. In essence, it’s merely to satisfy the inner ego.
- The matter is entirely different when one purchases with the hope profiting from an anticipated price increase. Now, this is speculative and timing is of the essence. Some would call this investing but some call it time gambling.
- If this is what one is hoping with the purchase, then, all the best as any drop in price may spell financial disaster. The final outcome will depend on one’s financial prowess and holding power.
- To the genuine buyers out there, now is as good a time as anytime. May you find your ideal unit.
Wednesday, 14 August 2013
Property Investment Musings
- New property prices in Johor Bahru are at stratospheric levels and we suspect, on a square foot basis, it's probably the highest in Malaysia now. We don’t have statistical data to prove but it sure does feel like it.
- Consumer goods as well as produce at the wet markets are obscenely priced and we wonder how the lower income group even survive these days.
- When asked why Johor Bahru is experiencing this nasty phenomenon, the finger is readily pointed at Singaporeans. They seem to be at the receiving end on almost anything that has a price on it.
- We think it’s not fair to blame them for everything that’s price related. To a large extent, Johor Bahru’s prosperity is largely dependent on Singapore. Just like most border towns of the world, prices tend to be higher than the national average.
- It is said that over 100,000 people cross into Singapore on a daily basis for their employment. These Malaysian’s bring back valuable Singapore Dollar into Malaysia and enjoy a higher than average per capita income.
- With a stronger purchasing power, these Malaysians also possess higher disposable income to spend on discretionary items such as a second property, holidays, better quality food, luxury items, etc. So, Johoreans who earn Dollars have also contributed to price increases.
- The state of Johor has ample land for its entire population many times over. Look around and it’s still possible to see oil palm plantations within 25km radius of Johor Bahru City.
- Then why has prices gone up? Well, if one were to see positively, we have to thank our Southern neighbours. Their strong Dollar has created demand and investors who bought into property many years ago are able to realise profits on their investment.
- Singaporeans in a way have helped create wealth just by buying into new properties and older properties within the same area automatically increase in value. Isn’t this also enriching Malaysians?
- To attract investments, our Government also improved infrastructures such as the Coastal Highway, fibre optic connections, tax breaks for returning Malaysians, etc.
- Didn’t this improve the standard of living for Johoreans? Aren’t we able to reach home faster and have faster internet connections?
- While they have contributed to price escalation, we must balance that criticism with the merits that Singapore has done for Johor Bahru. The city state not only provides employment, it also assisted in better lifestyle and helped create wealth and conveniences.
- With that, we would like to wish a belated birthday to Singapore. May you prosper strength to strength!
Monday, 5 August 2013
Property Investment Musings
- I recollect that in Year 2002, there was an exemption on stamp duty for property transactions to reduce the overhang that was plaguing the nation.
- Developers were stuck with property that just could not be sold as many, especially the ones who speculated just before the Asian Financial Crisis, were still licking their wounds.
- Genuine buyers also shied away as the weak economy either made it difficult to raise even the 10% down payment or be very cautious in their spending.
- Interest rates were in the BLR + X% range and double storey houses could still be purchased below RM200,000.
- The situation is in stark contrast today. Locations such as Nusa Bestari, Bukit Indah and Horizon Hills are retailing double storey units at nothing less than RM650,000. Once in a while, units do come at lower prices by these tend to be rare and far in between.
- Herein lies an opportunity for early buyers to use their timing advantage and finance the purchase of a new unit. Rather than struggle to raise fresh funds for the inflated 10% down payment for the new unit, one just has to use their existing property to grow the asset portfolio.
- Let’s say a double storey house was purchased for RM200,000 in Year 2002 with an initial loan of RM180,000 on a monthly instalment of RM1,200.
- Assuming the valuation has risen to RM600,000 today, banks would be willing to lend up to 90% of this amount which translates to RM540,000.
- Let’s say the original loan is now reduced to RM105,000. The owner can now apply for a maximum of RM435,000 in cash as a second loan on the same property. These funds can now be used to finance the purchase new units.
- Theoretically, this scenario is only possible provided ones credit history with the bank is good and current income is capable of handling the increased loan amount.
- Back to the increased loan. Now there will be 2 loans to service on the same property. Depending on the bank, the increased loan can either be charged at a rate that is similar to normal housing loans or as a collateralised personal loan.
- If it’s treated as an increased housing loan, interest rates are relatively lower but the bank is likely to demand a valuation report as well as a fresh set of legal papers so as to register a new charge on the property.
- This process can take slightly over a month and fees alone can take up to 2% of the new loan amount.
- Where the new loan is taken as a collateralised personal loan, only stamp duty will be imposed for the extra loan and in most cases, valuation report can also be waived.
- In essence it is a personal loan but with the property as collateral. Interest rates are thus lower than a regular personal loan but higher than housing rates.
- The only drawback of the 2nd loan approach is that the borrower is stuck with the same bank as the loans cannot be split between separate lenders.
- This may not be the most efficient form of financing as the original loan could be on a BLR + X% basis while the increased loan may be on BLR – Y% basis.
- Where needed, the property can be refinanced with a new lender who may offer a more cost effective package.
- Many people are unaware that monies can be taken out of their appreciated property this way. When used properly, this avenue can be used for cash flow management and capture opportunities as and when they arise.
- Happy property shopping!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)